Sunday, December 2, 2012

ObamaCare Fallout: Walmart Ends Insurance For New Hires

1 Dec 2012 694 post a comment

And so the government takeover of our health care system begins:

Walmart, the nation’s largest private employer, plans to begin denying health insurance to newly hired employees who work fewer than 30 hours a week, according to a copy of the company’s policy obtained by The Huffington Post. …
Walmart declined to disclose how many of its roughly 1.4 million U.S. workers are vulnerable to losing medical insurance under its new policy. …
Labor and health care experts portrayed Walmart’s decision to exclude workers from its medical plans as an attempt to limit costs while taking advantage of the national health care reform known as Obamacare. Among the key features of Obamacare is an expansion of Medicaid, the taxpayer-financed health insurance program for poor people. Many of the Walmart workers who might be dropped from the company’s health care plans earn so little that they would qualify for the expanded Medicaid program, these experts said.
By making the fine for not providing health care cheaper than providing health care, this was always the plan: to encourage employers to send us to the government.
Remember how Obama's big ObamaCare sell was, "You get to keep the health insurance you have"?
It was all a lie, a hustle, a con, a ruse…
But now it's the law of the land … forever.

Follow  John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC
So you thought you could keep your health insurance.  You idiots heard what Obama wanted you to hear.   He continues his REVENGE,  by dividing our people, ignoring the laws and increasing his power at the expense of the two other branches of government.  If we continue to entertain the King's fancies we will find ourselves at the mercy of his tyrannical policies.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

GPG n Feast Day - Shrine 0816
Green Bay Bishop David Ricken is shown here at the outdoor mass for the feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary in August. In a letter to parishoners this week, Ricken addressed the issues Catholics should consider when voting Nov. 6.

Friday, October 26, 2012



Morning Bell: Obama Administration Will Pay Companies to Violate the Law

October 26, 2012 at 8:08 am
 
The Obama Administration’s disregard for the law has struck again—and this time, it’s encouraging others to violate the law at taxpayer expense.
That’s worth saying again: The Obama Administration is encouraging people to violate a law, and promising that it will use taxpayer money to cover fines incurred from this action.
The law: The law in question is called the WARN Act, and it requires that federal contractors send employees layoff notices 60 days before a plant closing or mass layoff.
( read more )http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/26/morning-bell-obama-administration-will-pay-companies-to-violate-the-law/?roi=echo3-13574897919-10092774-fb81eb2eda0d55c6708080926e256c35&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Thursday, October 25, 2012

For America's future, The Post endorses Mitt Romney for president

  • Last Updated: 11:34 AM, October 25, 2012
  • Posted: 1:51 AM, October 25, 2012
Four frustratingly long years ago, a war-weary and economically battered America took a flier on a savior.
It didn’t work out.
Now, in 12 days, the nation will return to the polls — to reject, or to ratify, the results of the great Barack Obama experiment.
That is, to reject or to ratify the notion that hoping for change is a sound footing for productive national policy.
But, by the evidence, it is not.
It cannot create jobs.
It cannot reduce deficits.
It cannot restore foreign confidence in America — or Americans’ confidence in their own great nation.

AP
Mitt Romney
America needs more than hope. It needs leadership. That is why The Post today endorses the candidacy of Mitt Romney for president of the United States.
See more at http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/mitt_will_get_the_jobs_done_9hpevJPvBnMgJ0GMyGb0GO


    The post couldn't have said it better.  To say the least, the 4 years have been frustrating, but more than that, we have been witness to the greatest scheme that has ever been perpetrated on the American people.
     With God's guidance and  the leadership of true Americans, officeholders and the people, we can restore what an amateur and demagogue has tried to transform with ideology.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

 

Obama Campaign Co-Chair Eva Longoria Promotes Vulgar Attack on Romney


Print Article Send a Tip
17 Oct 2012, 11:55 AM PDT 209 post a comment

This "Housewife" isn't just "Desperate." She's vulgar.

Eva Longoria, one of Hollywood's most ardent supporters of President Barack Obama and a co-chair of the president's reelection campaign, took a dip in the gutter today on Twitter.
She retweeted a gross comment aimed at GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney in the hours after last night's second presidential debate.

She retweeted a gross comment aimed at GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney in the hours after last night's second presidential debate.

Get used to this. Obama is dropping in the polls, and the two presidential debates have shown the country - sans liberal media filter - what a smart, accomplished leader Romney is.
Expect more hate from Hollywood, from wholly untrue attacks on Romney's stance on women's issues to flat out vulgarities.

 Longoria needs some lessons in etiquette and while she's at it she could use some charm school or maybe just some basic language arts.
 She obviously lacks eloquence, among other things. 



Eva Longoria nasty Tweet

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

REMEMBER, OBAMA SHOOK HIS HAND,
EMBRACING HIS FRIENDSHIP
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez waves the national flag while celebrating from a balcony at Miraflores Palace in Caracas October 7, 2012. REUTERS-Jorge Silva

CARACAS | Mon Oct 8, 2012 2:13pm BST
(Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez promised to deepen his socialist revolution after a comfortable election victory that could extend to 20 yrs his polarizing leadership of the South American OPEC nation.      

The new six-year term will let Chavez consolidate his control over Venezuela's economy, possibly by extending a wave of nationalizations, and continue his support for left-wing allies in Latin America and around the world.
"This has been the perfect battle, a democratic battle," Chavez thundered from the palace balcony late on Sunday, holding up a replica of the sword of independence hero Simon Bolivar.
"Venezuela will continue along the path of democratic and Bolivarian socialism of the 21st century."
Turnout was a record 80 percent of registered voters, boosting Chavez's democratic credentials despite critics' depiction of him as a dictator.


The victory was considerably slimmer than his win by 25 percentage points in 2006, reflecting growing frustration at his failure to fix problems such as crime, blackouts and corruption.
"I WILL BE BETTER"
In a nod to those complaints, Chavez said he would be more focused in his new term beginning on January 10.
"Today we start a new cycle of government, in which we must respond with greater efficacy and efficiency to the needs of our people," he said. "I promise you I'll be a better president."
A retired lieutenant colonel who first won fame with a failed 1992 coup, Chavez has become Latin America's main anti-U.S. agitator, criticizing Washington while getting close to its adversaries, including Cuba, Syria and Iran.
A decade-long oil boom has given him tens of billions of dollars for social investments that range from free health clinics to new apartment complexes, helping him build a strong following among the poor.
Following his victory on Sunday, Chavez could order new nationalizations in some largely untouched corners of the economy, including the banking, food and health industries. He took advantage of his landslide win in 2006 to order takeovers in the telecoms, electricity and oil sectors.
But any recurrence of the pelvic cancer which has already forced him to undergo three operations in Havana since June 2011 could derail his plans.
Opposition leaders were crushed by the loss. It followed nearly a month of euphoria among Capriles supporters as the 40-year-old polished his stump speeches, held increasingly fervent rallies and appeared be to gaining ground in the polls.
"We are all hurt and sad but not disappointed. It was an incredible campaign," said housewife Teresa Perez, 51.
"Now I don't know what's going to happen with Chavez in power for six more years."
The youthful state governor put on a brave face, hailing his "house-by-house" campaign as the start of a long road to changing the direction of the country.
"I gave it my all and I'm proud of what we built," a subdued Capriles told supporters at his campaign headquarters.
"I will continue to work for Venezuela."

Though Capriles was indisputably the strongest candidate to face Chavez since the leftist leader was elected in 1998, few in the opposition thought the fight was fair.
Chavez made ample use of state television and spent 47 hours in "chain" broadcasts that force other local television stations to carry speeches peppered with political commentary.
He also handed out houses and pensions financed with state funds, often in ceremonies that glorified his administration, while warning that the opposition would cancel such programs.
The spending spree has weakened Venezuela's finances and may force a currency devaluation in early 2013, which would likely spur inflation that has been a top complaint among voters.
The election result is likely to prompt a sell-off in Venezuelan bonds, which have jumped in recent weeks on Wall Street optimism about a possible Capriles win.
"Going forward, we believe the market is likely to, as in recent years, continue to look at Venezuela as a gradually deteriorating macro story and trade it increasingly as an oil play," Goldman Sachs said in a research note.
Relations with Washington are also likely to remain on edge, though Venezuelan oil has continued to flow to the United States over the years despite diplomatic tensions.


IS THIS WHAT OBAMA CELEBRATES WITH A HANDSHAKE ?
IS THIS OBAMA'S VISION FOR AMERICA

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

 

 Hail Mary: Losing the Election, Obama Needs a Debate Knock-Out

by Mike Flynn

 


 





Yes, I realize everyone in the media is telling me that the race for President is over. With 5 weeks to go, Obama has been called the winner by the DC bubble of journalists. Even the beltway GOP has gotten into the act. (My hatred of them will become clear on November 7th) An objective read of recent polling, however, shows that Obama is clearly in trouble. Obama is losing and it is his campaign that needs a boost from today's debate.  Read more at

  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/02/

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Viral video touting free 'Obama phone' puts spotlight on federal program


A viral video of an Obama supporter touting her “Obama phone” has put the spotlight on an obscure federal program that provides discounted phone service to qualifying low-income Americans.
“Keep Obama as president,” the animated woman says on the video. “He gave us a phone.”
The video is drawing attention to the government program — Lifeline — as a national debate unfolds on entitlements and the growing percentage of Americans who pay no income taxes and get a long menu of government benefits. But even though some beneficiaries may credit President Obama for providing the phones, Lifeline is an extension of a program that has existed since 1985. Still, critics including Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark., note the program has swelled from $772 million in 2008 to $1.6 billion.
“It's a government-run, taxpayer-funded program that's running wild and costing more and more,” reads Griffin’s official House of Representatives website.
Private carriers who contract with the government, including TracPhone and Sprint, have websites intended to publicize the program. Some attempt to dispel the program’s connection to the president, such as freegovernmentcellphones.net, while others, including obamaphone.net, embrace it.
“The free Obama phone is an important program, especially for low income families that would otherwise not have access to basic communications,” the homepage of obamaphone.net reads.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012


Mitt Romney is right


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/18/mitt-romney-gets-it-right/#ixzz26uxw7GZ4
There is no sin greater in a presidential race than telling the truth. Romney is being excoriated for accurately describing the situation in America today. Here are the stats:
*49% of all Americans pay no fed income tax
*47% receive a check from the government of which more than half are means tested welfare checks (Medicaid, welfare, food stamps, etc.)
*36% of all Americans of working age are either not working or looking for work.
We must remember, however, that a great many of those who receive checks from the government have earned them. Some by their taxes over the years to Social Security and Medicare and others by paying a deeper price by service to their country.
The benefits Romney was talking about are means tested benefits, distributed based on income. All together 100 million Americans receive such benefits (out of a total population of 308 million), these benefits include welfare, food stamps, Section 8 housing, Medicaid and other such programs.
Generalities are always unjust. And painting with broad strokes will do many individuals an injustice. But the fact remains that our electorate is basically bifurcated into those who pay taxes and those who receive benefits.
The danger comes not with the benefit but with the sense of entitlement. Why do so many people feel Romney will be better at improving the economy and yet still plan to vote for Obama? The answer is that they care more about preserving their entitlements than about improving the economy. They have come to rely on political action more than economic growth as the key to their solvency.
Did Romney err in telling it like it is? It would have been better if he had made a forthright, factual statement on the issue. It looks bad for these unpleasant facts to come out in a "gotcha" moment at a videotaped private event. But the fact remains that an Obama reelection would turn the tide psychologically in America from the land of upward mobility through hard work and initiative and toward a country akin to Greece: dependent on government aid in the form of a subsidy and government handouts.
By stating this fundamental truth, albeit off the record, Romney has done a service for which he should be praised not excoriated. It all boils down to what John Kennedy said: There are those who ask what their country can do for you, and those who ask what you can do for your country.
Dick Morris is a Fox News contributor and author. His latest book is "Screwed!: How Foreign Countries Are Ripping America Off and Plundering Our Economy-and How Our Leaders Help Them Do It." Visit his website: www.dickmorris.com and follow him on Twitter@dickmorris.

Monday, July 9, 2012




       It matters and that's why 

on July 3, 2012 the Cure' of Ars Religious Liberty Group  observed the true Meaning of the 4th of July with patriotic readings and prayer, at the beautiful Garden of Mercy (Cure' of Ars Church), recognizing  America's exceptionalism in her struggle for Independence and the wisdom of Great men to conceptualize it in a document that would stand the test of time.  These timeless truths come to us from our Creator and they inspired a Declaration of Independence that included them as self evident.  

 But the time has come when men of no honor, promote deceit to gain popularity and erode God-given rights to replace with government edicts.  So we are called at this moment in time to live up to similar challenges our forefathers faced, with the prospect of  losses as well.  But we, like our forefathers will not allow fear to dissuade us or weaken our resolve to reestablish for future generations what was so generously passed on to us by the sacrifices of so many.  Many men of Honor, We Thank You for your Courage, for your Selflessness and Pray that we will act in your honor to preserve our great nation, its Constitution and the Promise of Freedom.
   

HHS’s Bishop Bash

Last Updated: 11:49 PM, July 7, 2012
Posted: July 08, 2012
Everyone knows President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services is in hot holy water with the Catholic bishops — for trying to force them to conform church beliefs to the administration’s.
But more is at issue than the HHS contraception mandate in ObamaCare, even now that the Supreme Court has upheld that law.
Last fall, HHS pulled the plug on a program run by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to help victims of sex trafficking. Since 2006 — when President George W. Bush’s HHS awarded a five-year, $19 million-plus grant for the project — the bishops had satisfactorily provided housing, counseling and other services to help trafficking victims put their lives back together.

Getty Images for Young Elected O
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
There was just one condition: The bishops, following Catholic doctrine, wouldn’t help clients get contraceptives or abortions.
That obviously violated a sacred teaching in the Church of Obama. So when the time came for HHS to decide whether to continue funding the bishops’ work, the feds took off points for their refusal to promote abortions.
And yet, even with this deduction, as The Washington Post reported, HHS’s own review process still scored the bishops’ funding application much higher than two of their competitors’.
All’s well that ends well, right?
Wrong.
Despite the fact that the two other groups were — by any objective measure — far less qualified than the bishops to administer the trafficking-victims program, political officials at HHS gave those groups the money. Of the four organizations that sought grants, only the Catholic bishops were denied — for standing on principle.
To add insult to injury, the USCCB is now refighting this battle in court.
In 2009, the American Civil Liberties Union sued over the trafficking-victims program — arguing that because the government’s exemption for abortions accommodated a religious principle, it violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause.
Last March, a federal judge in Massachusetts agreed — ruling against the bishops and saying that, under the Constitution, HHS had to nix their application.
But here’s the rub: Because the original ACLU lawsuit actually targeted HHS for agreeing to the bishops’ restrictions, the Obama administration and the USCCB are technically on the same side in the legal fight against the Anti-Christian Loonies Union. And guess what: In May, the administration filed notice that it would appeal the Massachusetts court’s ruling.
The question now is, what will that appeal look like? Will the Obama legal team pull a bait-and-switch and refuse to fight for real, as it did with the Defense of Marriage Act?
Or will it mount a good-faith defense of religious liberty?
Catholic teaching holds that no transgressor is beyond hope of redemption. After Team O’s one-two punch — hitting the bishops’ program and then imposing the contraception mandate — let’s see if Obama & Co. will prove that teaching right.
Standing up for the bishops in court would be a good place to start.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/hhs_bishop_bash_qekOTe1sIBHBTeTs7mjaZM#ixzz20925FgnA

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Ingraham"s advice to Romney
and I Agree!

Ingraham To Romney: "Get Out There On The Trail And Get Off The Jet Ski"

"It seems to me that the way the [Romney] campaign advisers are speaking to the press, they want to quickly move off of ObamaCare to just a general take on the economy and jobs. And that is where they think their gold is. That is what they think is the strong points for Romney is and where his strengths lie," radio host and television commentator Laura Ingraham said about Mitt Romney today on her nationally syndicated program The Laura Ingraham Show.

"For me, I think he needs to be out there, [at a] patriotic venue," Ingraham suggested. "Why not? Not that I don't like Lake Winnipesaukee, it's gorgeous, it's beautiful and you have every right to celebrate your family and I think they're wonderful people. That's fine."

"I don't even think this is his fault," Ingraham opined. "This is his advisers. This is not Romney, this is the advisers telling him, 'Oh, it's fine. Take a week.' There's no week to spare, we have a country to save."

"Should Romney call the ceasefire or get out there on the trail and get off the jet ski?" Ingraham asked at the end of the segment.


Posted By Ian Schwartz Send To A Friend Comm

Monday, July 2, 2012

Krauthammer On Romney & ObamaCare: To Be Consistent And Logical A "Mistake"

"I think this attempt, as you just heard, to be consistent and logical on the issue is a mistake," syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said about senior Romney adviser Eric Fehrnstrom not believing the individual mandate is a tax. "Even Chief Justice Roberts, in his opinion, is totally twisted in trying to decide if it's a tax or a penalty. In fact, at one point in the decision he says that for the purposes of the Constitution it's a tax, but for the purposes of the Anti-Injunction Act, an arcane reason why the suit would be invalid in the first place, it is not a tax, it's a penalty."

"So even he didn't have it straight. So don't worry about getting into a twist over this and forget about consistency. Use whichever end of the argument you need at the time, it's exactly what Democrats are doing," Krauthammer said on the panel segment of FOX News' "Special Report."

"What Romney ought to say is, 'Okay it's a tax and it's like many of the other taxes heaped on to you by ObamaCare.' The augmentation of the capital gains tax, the tax on medical devices so every time you need a stent you're actually indirectly paying a tax on this. And say this is just one of many things that you have to do to sustain a system, a law, that the CBO says will cost $1.76 trillion," Krauthammer said on Monday night's broadcast.

"The money is not coming out of heaven like manna, you're going to have to tax people for that. This is one of the many taxes. Stick with that, run with that and then use other arguments in other places. But trying to square a circle that even Roberts isn't going able to, I think is a mistake," Krauthammer concluded.


 Mark Levin on Roberts

 

 Mark Levin: Time For Term Limits On Supreme Court


"I think it turns out he’s extremely political -- to my great chagrin. I think he reads the media. I think the libs know that and the libs, like the mob, will be in for the next decision. This is just the first. They're going to want more from him," nationally syndicated radio talk show host Mark Levin told Neil Cavuto on Monday's broadcast of his FOX News show.

"This is why I argued six or seven years ago in 'Men in Black' and I am going to reintroduce this argument: Term limits for justices. If justices want to be political then they shouldn’t serve for life because the American people deserve better than this. And that's the bottom line. Whatever Roberts thinks -- whatever we call this, a tax, a punishment, [or] a cucumber," Levin said.

"The fact of the matter is we, the American people, deserve public officials, whether they’re elected or appointed to serve for life or for limited terms, who are go to uphold our institutions. And if not going to do it, there’s 312 million Americans. We'll find someone who can," Levin also said.

 Does Obama know the meaning of TRUTH?

 

 Obama must have been running his mouth when the rest of the class learned the merits of HONESTY.  I don't think he's read the definition in Webster's Dictionary or maybe he has and decided it's not HIS definition. Just like he shut down Stephanopolous for reading him the dictionary meaning of tax.  Obama says its stretching it to look up the actual meaning of words.  I guess Robert's was stretching it when he found an out to uphold Obamacare.  We're living in the world of Obama logic.  We had Obama Mania now we have Obama Logic.      

 

 

'Washington Post' Backs Off Claim Romney Outsourced Jobs

 
 
 


Print Article Send a Tip
2 Jul 2012, 7:30 AM PDT 21 post a comment

After being caught for the third time in as many months coordinating with the Obama campaign to attack Mitt Romney, the Washington Post finally -- in the most cowardly and slippery manner imaginable -- came clean today regarding the provably false charge that the presumptive GOP nominee outsourced American jobs during his tenure at Bain Capital:

The actual [Washington Post article in question] article, in fact, does not say that transfers of U.S. jobs took place while Romney ran the private equity firm of Bain Capital. …
The Obama campaign moved quickly to define what the article said, claiming that this transfer of jobs took place while Romney ran Bain. That’s not what the original article said.
This is how dishonest media cowards who wake up in the morning with David Axelrod nuzzling their ear correct maliciously-timed, journalistic hit jobs that can no longer withstand scrutiny.
What the Post's "fact checker," Glenn Kessler, is doing here is two-fold:
First, Kessler's attempting to rewrite and loophole the Post's butt out of a sling. Now that it's been proven Romney is only responsible for creating American jobs and not outsourcing them, Kessler wants us to believe the Post's front-page hit-piece never (who us?) claimed Romney was responsible for outsourcing.
Are you going to believe Kessler, or your lying eyes? The Post's own headline:
And I cannot be more clear in stating, once again, that this front page feature piece with a headline that is nothing more than a lie, ran the day after the Obama campaign launched its dishonest outsourcing attack. If you don't think this was coordinated, you don’t think at all.
Kessler can rationalize and parse and shimmy-shammy like some hustler trying to convince us the stereo in his trunk isn't stolen, but the intent of the Post hit is all that matters, and the intent was to jump on and aid and abet Obama's new attack strategy for maximum damage. This is how the Post and the Obama campaign team up to create false narratives and to help President FailureTeleprompter do the most important work he can before Labor Day, and that's define Mitt Romney.  
Something even the slippery Kessler cannot parse, though, is that the Post's article references two companies responsible for outsourcing that Bain didn't acquire until after Romney left the venture capital firm!
And where's Kessler's explanation for why the Post cited no outsourcing numbers to substantiate its lying headline? Why doesn't Kessler explain to us why the Post either didn’t bother to contact or bother to quote the CEOs of the companies in question, who would've told them in no uncertain terms that no outsourcing occurred under Romney's tenure at Bain (just answered my own question, didn't I?). Why does Kessler ignore the fact that the Post lied through the art of omission by not reporting the fact that SEC filings prove no American call centers were moved overseas but that these overseas call centers already existed when Bain acquired the companies in question? Furthermore, the numbers of AMERICAN jobs at call centers INCREASED under Romney's tenure.
Instead of answering these inconvenient questions, what does the oh-so-respected and Orwellian-named Washington Post fact checker do? Well, that's the second thing…
Kessler shamelessly signals to the Obama campaign that it can continue lying about Romney's record by citing the Post's dishonest reporting….
The Obama campaign moved quickly to define what the article said, claiming that this transfer of jobs took place while Romney ran Bain. That’s not what the original article said. …
Given that this debate involves an interpretation of a Post article, we are not going to award any Pinocchios.
That's right, even though FactCheck.org has declared the new Obama ads dishonest, and Kessler even says the ads are dishonest….
One of [the Obama campaign's] outsourcing ads before the article ran, in fact, earned Four Pinocchios. These new ads would not fare much better; there is little in the Post article that backs up the Obama campaign’s spin
…Kessler refuses to award Pinnocchios.
Which means that under the imprimatur of the Washington Post, the Obama campaign is free to continue lying about Romney being an outsourcer-in-chief -- which further means that the conspiracy hatched between the Post and the Obama campaign to flat-out lie about Romney is free to continue unabated.
TEN DAYS LATER, after its story completely falls apart under the pressing weight of what you and I call facts, in so many Clintonesque words, the corrupt Post finally admits Romney is not responsible for outsourcing... but only does so by burying that fact in a piece published long after Team Obama has been allowed to use the Post's dishonest reporting to lie about Romney in a massive ad campaign.
And as far as the Post is concerned, it is okey-doke by them if the Obama campaign continues to lie, using them as cover.
It's as if Politico and the Washington Post entered a contest to see which failing news outlet could disgrace themselves more before the year was out.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Scalia takes swipe at Obama immigration action

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is shown. | AP Photo
Scalia said the Framers would've 'rushed to the exits' at Obama's immigration ideas. | AP Photo
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia suggested Monday that the Framers of the Constitution would have “rushed to the exits” if presented with the idea behind President Barack Obama’s recent decision not to enforce certain immigration laws.
The Supreme Court’s decision to strike down most of the key provisions of Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law “boggles the mind” in light of the Obama policy shift, Scalia added.

Speaking in dissent of most of the court’s rulings on Arizona’s immigration law, Scalia took a clear swipe in his remarks at the Obama administration’s new policy ending deportations of many young adults brought into the country illegally — which was not part of the Arizona case.
“The president has said that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administration’s proposed revision of the immigration laws,” Scalia said. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona might not think so.”
Scalia asked whether states would have entered into the union had the Constitution included a clause enacting immigration laws but stipulating that the president had a choice on whether to enforce them. Delegates would have “rushed to the exits” at Independence Hall.
By passing a state immigration law, he added, Arizona had “moved to protect its sovereignty — not in contradiction of federal law, but in complete compliance with it.”
But, “if securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign state.”
The court upheld a key piece of the Arizona’s law — requiring police to check the immigration status of those they arrest or stop for questioning — but struck down other pieces of the law, arguing the state had stepped into the bounds of federal law.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77791.html#ixzz1yuDfXrqj

Monday, June 25, 2012

White House congratulates Egypt's Morsi

The White House congratulated Egypt's president-elect Mohamed Morsi on his victory in that country's presidential election, calling it a "milestone" in the country's transition to democracy.
President Obama called Morsi Sunday evening, telling him that the United States would stand by Egypt in its transitional period — and said that he looked forward to working together.
(Also on POLITICO: Elections in Egypt)

Of course Obama congratulated Muslim Brotherhood president-elect, Mohamed Morsi. After all Obama takes a large part of the credit for the result. He threatened billions in U.S. aid to the Egyptian Military leaders if they did not hand power over to the Muslim Brotherhood Leader. The Obama administration warned Egypt’s military leaders on Monday to speedily hand over power or risk losing billions of dollars in U.S. military and economic aid to the country.(americac2c.com) Does anybody doubt Obama's influence in the predictable outcome and decline into the hands of Radical Islamists.

Monday, June 11, 2012




School pulls patriotic song at graduation, but Justin Bieber's 'Baby' is OK


A Coney Island principal refused to let students sing "God Bless the USA" at a school ceremony -- but Justin Bieber's "Baby" was suitable.
A controversial Coney Island principal has pulled the plug on patriotism.
Her refusal to let students sing “God Bless the USA” at their graduation has sparked fireworks at a school filled with proud immigrants.
Greta Hawkins, principal of PS 90, the Edna Cohen School, won’t allow kindergartners to belt out the beloved Lee Greenwood ballad, also known as “Proud to be an American,” at their moving-up ceremony.
Greta Hawkins, principal of PS 90
Greta Hawkins, principal of PS 90
Five classes spent months learning the patriotic song, which skyrocketed in popularity after the 9/11 attacks and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
SCHOOLS CHIEF BACKS DECISION TO SWAP 'USA' SONG WITH BIEBER
It was to be the rousing finale of their musical show at the June 20 commencement. The kids, dressed up for their big day, would wave tiny American flags — which, as the lyrics proclaim, “still stand for freedom.”
But Hawkins marched in on a recent rehearsal and ordered a CD playing the anthem to be shut off, staffers said.
She told the teachers to drop the song from the program.
“We don’t want to offend other cultures,” they quoted her as explaining.
The curt edict stunned both staff and parents.
“A lot of people fought to move to America to live freely, so that song should be sung with a whole lot of pride,” said mom Luz Lozada, whose son, Daniel, is in kindergarten.
The song has been sung at previous school events. Last year’s fifth-graders, including another Lozada child, performed it at graduation.
“Everybody applauded and whistled,” the mom said. “They gave it a standing ovation.”
Parents — many immigrants from Pakistan, Mexico and Ecuador — “love it,” Lozada said.
A teacher agreed: “It makes them a little goosebumpy and teary-eyed. I’ve never come across anyone who felt it insulted their culture.”
Department of Education spokeswoman Jessica Scaperotti gave The Post an explanation staffers said they never heard — that Hawkins found the lyrics “too grown up” for 5-year-olds.
The song starts: “If tomorrow all the things were gone, I’d worked for all my life. And I had to start again, with just my children and my wife, I’d thank my lucky stars, to be livin’ here today.”
Scaperotti said the department supports the principal’s decision. “The lyrics are not age-appropriate,” she said.
But Justin Bieber’s flirty song about teen romance, “Baby,” was deemed a fine selection for the show. Hawkins had no problem with 5-year-olds singing lines such as, “Are we an item? Girl, quit playing.”
The other songs: “We’re All Together Again,” popular at Scout campfires; “The World is a Rainbow,” which celebrates diversity; “Shake Your Sillies Out” by Raffi; and “You’ve Got a Friend in Me” from “Toy Story.”
Scaperotti noted PS 90 kids recite the Pledge of Allegiance and sing “America the Beautiful” each morning. Insiders say Hawkins tried to end that tradition a couple years ago but staff objected.
The principal, a Jehovah’s Witness, does not recite the pledge because her religion forbids followers to salute any nation’s flag. Staffers gripe she doesn’t stand in respect during the school-wide ritual.
The song uproar comes amid tensions. Hawkins has been called a tyrant and bully by some staffers.
The DOE reprimanded her in 2010 after teachers complained she called the school “racist” and declared: “I’m black. Your previous principal was white and Jewish. More of us are coming.”
Scaperotti said Hawkins is being targeted by the teachers union and has received hate mail, which is under investigation by the NYPD.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/school_silences_patriotic_song_xdunXcLPbE8S2rAEcZoUiP#ixzz1xXwFD5Fk

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

OBAMA INVITES HIMSELF TO SPEAK AT BARNARD COLLEGE


   Obama can't help himself when he finds himself in front of an impressionable, female audience.  He caresses their minds with his innuendo of being  "The Savior of all Intolerance" ,current and past.  You see Obama has the unique understanding of historical injustices, not like us mere mortals living in the here and now.  His brilliant mind is unrestricted by time and space, so he says "We can assume that there were founding mothers whispering smarter things in the ears of the founding fathers.  Of course this must have been the case because Obama says so and Obama knows that young women in the audience, impressed with him will be charmed by his words. They are. Listen to the adoring women.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Creepy, Narcissist Obama Inserts His Own Propaganda Into White House Presidential Biographies


On the White House website you can find biographies of all 44 Presidents of the United States. But did you know that the biographies have been updated with little tidbits about all of the wonderful things President Obama has done since taking office?

   

I guess a failed presidency calls for drastic measures.  When your biggest achievements are a Health Care Law disapproved by more than half the American people, Executive Orders conspicuously passed, a false claim that it was his goal that resulted in the death of Osama Bin Ladin, an increase in the deficit totaling more than all previous presidents combined,... the One has to elevate his status by linking his presidency to the successes of past presidents.  This man will stop at nothing to have the outcome he desires.  But the people have a will and a desired outcome.  We will decide his fate on election day. 

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Obama Campaigns in Afghanistan

 

Breibart.com 

 Today, President Obama essentially declared victory in Afghanistan. Just in time for his re-election campaign, of course.

First, he blamed President Bush for us not winning the Afghanistan war sooner. “Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken longer than most anticipated,” said Obama. What were those reasons? “America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq.”


Then he claimed credit for President Bush’s goals: “The goal that I set – to defeat al Qaeda, and deny it a chance to rebuild – is within reach.” Only that was Bush’s goal, not Obama’s. Obama was late to the party; he was busy accusing American troops of air-raiding villages and killing civilians.
                                                                  




Monday, April 9, 2012

Apr 9, 2012 2:21pm

Hoopster In Chief Has Own Image on Ball*

Using a special basketball festooned with his own image, President Obama shot some hoop today with former NBA players, Harlem Globetrotters and kids attending the White House Easter Egg Hunt. The balls with the presidential face were brought for by the NBA  players who came to the event, White House officials said.
ht obama basketball jef 120409 wblog Hoopster In Chief Has Own Image on Ball*
(Image Credit: Network Pool Photo)


 Does this man have any humility?  He
 belongs among the world's famous 
 dictators, who take great 
 satisfaction in displaying their face
 for public adoration.  It's all about Obama. 
 That's all it's ever been about.  
 Oh... you thought it was about hope
 and change?  We got plenty of change
 and now I hope we reverse that
 change and remove him in November. 

Friday, March 9, 2012

    Soledad OBrien, a so called reporter, loses it as she desperately tries to defend, the indefensible.  She dismisses the news worthiness of the video, its significance to the vetting process and dismisses the DELIBEREATE action taken by mainstream media to conceal relevant info.   You have to admire Joel for his tenacity, his intellect and his superb presentation of the facts.

The Vetting: CNN Implodes Over Breitbart's Obama/Bell Video
www.breitbart.com
The Vetting: CNN Implodes Over Breitbart's Obama/Bell Video

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Brewer won't attend Obama dinner for governors


By David Jackson, USA TODAY
Updated 9h 6m ago
By Haraz N. Ghanbari, AP
President Obama is hosting a White House dinner tonight for the nation's governors, but one prominent state executive won't be there.Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer.
Brewer, whose finger-pointing confrontation with Obama last month has become a symbol for political polarization, told NBC's Meet the Press that she has prior engagements.
When NBC's David Gregory asked "are you showing disrespect for the office of the president?" Brewer replied: "Well, I hope that it isn't disrespect.
"I would not disrespect the president of the United States," Brewer said. "I have other commitments."
After the Jan. 25 incident on an airport tarmac in Phoenix, Brewer said Obama objected to her description of an earlier meeting in the Oval Office over immigration policy; the White House said Brewer distorted the details of that meeting in her book.
But the dispute lingers on, and has even been made the subject of T-shirt sales in Arizona.
Brewer told NBC she will be at the White House on Monday for a business meeting that Obama and Vice President Biden will hold with National Governors Association, in town for its annual meeting.
Tonight's Governors Dinner is "a social thing," Brewer said.
"You know," she said, "I am a governor, I've got priorities, and I will be there Monday, when we all meet and discuss policy."
See photos of: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Jan Brewer
TAGS:
Barack Obama Joe Biden Jan Brewer

Jan Brewer deserves respect for her convictions, her honesty and the example she sets for other leaders.  She is determined to fight for the enforcement of a legitimate law, for the interests of the Arizona people and for all Americans as we battle the lawless Obama White House.

 Obama Plays the Race Card

     Of course there is nothing about it reported in the media, because it would make Obama look like a racist and that wouldn't be good for his re-election campaign.  It defies all reason that the American people would accept this arrogance.  This is divisive and un-American and would be an effective campaign ad in November.  Listen to how he violates separation of church and state as he encourages members of faith communities to become "Congregation Captains".

Obama Plays Race Card, Calls on Churches to Support Campaign