Does Obama know the meaning of TRUTH?
Obama must have been running his mouth when the rest of the class learned the merits of HONESTY. I don't think he's read the definition in Webster's Dictionary or maybe he has and decided it's not HIS definition. Just like he shut down Stephanopolous for reading him the dictionary meaning of tax. Obama says its stretching it to look up the actual meaning of words. I guess Robert's was stretching it when he found an out to uphold Obamacare. We're living in the world of Obama logic. We had Obama Mania now we have Obama Logic.
'Washington Post' Backs Off Claim Romney Outsourced Jobs
After being caught for the third time in as many months coordinating with the Obama campaign to attack Mitt Romney, the Washington Post finally -- in the most cowardly and slippery manner imaginable -- came clean today regarding the provably false charge that the presumptive GOP nominee outsourced American jobs during his tenure at Bain Capital:
The actual [Washington Post article in question]
article, in fact, does not say that transfers of U.S. jobs took place
while Romney ran the private equity firm of Bain Capital. …
The Obama campaign moved quickly
to define what the article said, claiming that this transfer of jobs
took place while Romney ran Bain. That’s not what the original article
said.
This is how dishonest media cowards who
wake up in the morning with David Axelrod nuzzling their ear correct
maliciously-timed, journalistic hit jobs that can no longer withstand
scrutiny.
What the Post's "fact checker," Glenn Kessler, is doing here is two-fold:
First, Kessler's attempting to rewrite and loophole the Post's
butt out of a sling. Now that it's been proven Romney is only
responsible for creating American jobs and not outsourcing them, Kessler
wants us to believe the Post's front-page hit-piece never (who us?) claimed Romney was responsible for outsourcing.
Are you going to believe Kessler, or your lying eyes? The Post's own headline:
And I cannot be more clear in stating,
once again, that this front page feature piece with a headline that is
nothing more than a lie, ran the day after the Obama campaign launched its dishonest outsourcing attack. If you don't think this was coordinated, you don’t think at all.
Kessler can rationalize and parse and
shimmy-shammy like some hustler trying to convince us the stereo in his
trunk isn't stolen, but the intent of the Post hit is all that
matters, and the intent was to jump on and aid and abet Obama's new
attack strategy for maximum damage. This is how the Post and
the Obama campaign team up to create false narratives and to help
President FailureTeleprompter do the most important work he can before
Labor Day, and that's define Mitt Romney.
Something even the slippery Kessler cannot parse, though, is that the Post's article references two companies responsible for outsourcing that Bain didn't acquire until after Romney left the venture capital firm!
And where's Kessler's explanation for why the Post cited no outsourcing numbers to substantiate its lying headline? Why doesn't Kessler explain to us why the Post either
didn’t bother to contact or bother to quote the CEOs of the companies
in question, who would've told them in no uncertain terms that no
outsourcing occurred under Romney's tenure at Bain (just answered my own
question, didn't I?). Why does Kessler ignore the fact that the Post
lied through the art of omission by not reporting the fact that SEC
filings prove no American call centers were moved overseas but that
these overseas call centers already existed when Bain acquired the
companies in question? Furthermore, the numbers of AMERICAN jobs at call
centers INCREASED under Romney's tenure.
Instead of answering these inconvenient questions, what does the oh-so-respected and Orwellian-named Washington Post fact checker do? Well, that's the second thing…
Kessler shamelessly signals to the Obama campaign that it can continue lying about Romney's record by citing the Post's dishonest reporting….
The Obama campaign moved quickly
to define what the article said, claiming that this transfer of jobs
took place while Romney ran Bain. That’s not what the original article
said. …
Given that this debate involves an interpretation of a Post article, we are not going to award any Pinocchios.
That's right, even though FactCheck.org has declared the new Obama ads dishonest, and Kessler even says the ads are dishonest….
One of [the Obama campaign's]
outsourcing ads before the article ran, in fact, earned Four Pinocchios.
These new ads would not fare much better; there is little in the Post
article that backs up the Obama campaign’s spin
…Kessler refuses to award Pinnocchios.
Which means that under the imprimatur of the Washington Post,
the Obama campaign is free to continue lying about Romney being an
outsourcer-in-chief -- which further means that the conspiracy hatched
between the Post and the Obama campaign to flat-out lie about Romney is free to continue unabated.
TEN DAYS LATER, after its story
completely falls apart under the pressing weight of what you and I call
facts, in so many Clintonesque words, the corrupt Post finally
admits Romney is not responsible for outsourcing... but only does so by
burying that fact in a piece published long after Team Obama has been
allowed to use the Post's dishonest reporting to lie about Romney in a massive ad campaign.
And as far as the Post is concerned, it is okey-doke by them if the Obama campaign continues to lie, using them as cover.
It's as if Politico and the Washington Post entered a contest to see which failing news outlet could disgrace themselves more before the year was out.
No comments:
Post a Comment